Does the absence of a public member impact the operations of the Discipline Committee or Investigative Committee?

The absence of a public member does not influence the operations of the Discipline Committee or Investigative Committee because these committees are structured to function effectively even without a public member's presence. The rationale behind this is that the core functions and responsibilities of these committees are based on the expertise of the professional members who assess cases, carry out investigations, and make decisions regarding conduct or discipline.

While public members serve an important role in providing perspective and ensuring representation of the public interest, the legal and procedural frameworks governing these committees allow them to operate and reach conclusions independently of the public member’s involvement. Therefore, the absence of a public member does not inherently restrict their authority or functionality in carrying out their designated tasks.